![]() There's been a number of conversion rates in the last few years and none of them are quite right. I have to agree with most of this, ECF (BCF died years ago) need to pull their fingers out. bcf just doesnt convert well no matter how hard they try to botch it. If the people in england really want to be able to compare themselves to the rest of the world, they're going to need to use elo. bcf 90 is more like 1350, maybe not even that. "I'm sorry, bcf is a joke, and that table is way out. Someone with poor visualization skills is going to get a bigger boost from using an analysis board than someone with good visualization skills. Take the the analysis board as a substitute for visualization. The factors given will only cancel out if they apply to players evenly. My intuition tells me that the lower the ratings the less reliably they correlate, the higher the ratings, the better. I'm not going to suggest that ratings from diverse player pools and with different systems (ELO vs Glicko) should correlate, but the factors above would apply to one's opponent as well, so it should cancel out in principle. ![]() Though many might agree that if your tactical strength is significant, you will quite easily reach and maintain a very high rating. There really is nothing much to correlate. ![]() Touch move rules (no "uh-oh" moments between moving and hitting submit)ĭistractions such as opponent / other players / noise Demands on one's nerves, stamina and long-duration concentration skills. Opening Databases to leverage off other people's hard work :) Unlimited (24 hours = infinity for modern tournament players) time to kotov out your trees. Apples to oranges, in my questionable opinion.Īnalysis boards to make up for lack of visualization skills. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |